Do I engage my temporary staff on a 1099 or W2 basis?
This question is fundamental. It dictates your firm’s compliance with statutory requirements and has a direct effect on costs and cash flow. However, you might want to answer it from a compliance point of view and much less from a financial point of view.
You’re the CEO of a temporary staffing firm facing the pivotal decision of how to engage your workforce— use a 1099 Independent Contractor or W2 employee arrangement? This choice holds the key to your company’s compliance with legal mandates and its financial well-being. Yet, it’s a decision often approached with uncertainty, leading many to a Google search or a consultation with an employment lawyer. Many might just wing it and classify their temporaries on what feels right; however, this isn’t advisable, considering the legal implications misclassification can produce.
So, if it’s so important, why hasn’t this debate been resolved yet?
The debate over worker classification has persisted for decades, spurred by a significant legal case from the late 1990s involving Microsoft and the classification of workers as independent contractors. This case indeed had notable implications for how independent contractors were treated, not only at Microsoft but also across various industries. It singularly changed the temporary staffing industry as far as employee classification goes.
You might be interested in: Leading a Temporary Staffing Agency in Today’s Market
Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp.
This class-action lawsuit was filed in 1992 by a group of temporary workers who had been classified as independent contractors by Microsoft. The workers argued that they should have been classified as employees and, therefore, entitled to the benefits and protections associated with employee status.
In 1997, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, stating that the workers were, in fact, common-law employees rather than independent contractors. The court determined that Microsoft had exercised a significant degree of control over the workers’ activities, indicating an employer-employee relationship. As a result, the workers were entitled to retroactive benefits, including stock options, which amounted to a substantial financial settlement.
The Vizcaino case had significant implications for how companies classify temporary workers, particularly in the tech industry, where the extensive use of independent contractors was prevalent. Following the ruling, many companies reevaluated their classification practices and adjusted their policies to ensure compliance with employment laws.
The case underscored the importance of accurately classifying workers and the potential legal and financial risks associated with misclassification. It also highlighted the need for greater clarity and consistency in the criteria used to determine worker classification, which continues to be a topic of debate and legal scrutiny to this day.
This legacy, while unknown to many, even in the industry, dictates much in terms of correctly classifying employees. I know I faced these questions for many years as the CEO of a large staffing firm—25 years, in fact. But early on, I decided to go straight W2 across the board. I realized compliance was tenuous at best when applying for the IRS 20-factor independent contractor test. I wanted to focus on growth, profitability, and compliance, not worrying about employee classification. It felt small and distracting.
The landscape of worker classification is constantly evolving, driven by changes in technology, work arrangements, and legal interpretations. The rise of the gig economy has blurred the lines between traditional employees and independent contractors even more. This has created challenges for staffing companies who need to navigate this complex environment while ensuring compliance.
Read more: Best Practices to Overcome Insurance Fluctuations in Staffing
I’ve noticed the demand for W2 temporary workers is on the rise. Large companies are increasingly wary of the legal risks associated with misclassification, especially regarding benefits claims. By prioritizing W2 classification, they build a firewall against potential lawsuits.
In Summar Financial, we recognize the complexities surrounding all decisions regarding your workers. With over two decades of experience in the staffing industry, we understand the challenges you face. That’s why we offer comprehensive support, focusing not only on providing payroll funding solutions but also on compliance and strategic guidance.
If you’ve fallen behind on paying your 941 taxes or employee ‘Trust’ monies, we can help you build and execute a tight plan to get current. The penalties for nonpayment of 941 Trust monies are onerous, and the reason is apparent: this isn’t the employer’s money; it’s the employees. That’s why it’s highly recommended to have a payroll ally on your side so that you pay your 941s as the ordinary course of business.
I hope this article provided a sense of history on the topic. That was the goal.
At Summar, we’re looking at your big picture beyond just funding. The overall strength of our clients is important, as is their compliance. We realize we can offer a perspective and perhaps some direction on these issues. That’s the distinction with Summar: it’s about more than funding.
If you want Summar to review your situation and determine if we can capitalize a solution based on your invoices, please inquire. We’ll get right on it! Chances are we can.
